The psychological prehistory of migration characteristically involves utopian projections. However, the nature of these, their role in preparing for flight and their influence on post-migration behavior, are little studied. A personal view of this topic arises from the author’s ‘year in Venice’ when voluntary exile in Australia was foreseen. The utopian prejudice against migration is discussed. A distinction is made between inner and outer migration, leading to a discussion of migrant utopianism. In Venice this manifested itself as a distinction between an outer city of well-known views and an inner city known progressively through nocturnal wanderings. These wanderings developed an ‘in-between’ sensibility useful in managing the nostalgia conventionally associated with departing: perceptual landing places were cultivated that made the migrant’s provisional attachment to the new country bearable. The poetics of urban praxis described here is, it is argued, ultimately anti-utopianist, as it counters the construction of migration in terms of sharp division and decisive distance. Reflection on these preparations after living in Australia shows the impact they had on the development of a migrant poetics; but it also illuminates an erotic blockage, a resistance to being recognized.In this regard, migration may have been therapeutic