When faced with a poor set of document summaries on the first page of returned search results, a user may respond in various ways: by proceeding on to the next page of results; by entering another query; by switching to another service; or by abandoning their search. We analyse this aspect of searcher behaviour using a commercial search system, comparing a deliberately degraded system to the original one. Our results demonstrate that searchers naturally avoid selecting poor results as answers given the degraded system; however, the depth of the ranking that they view, their query reformulation rate, and the amount of time required to complete search tasks, are all remarkably unchanged.
Proceedings of the 3rd European Workshop on Human-Computer Interaction and Information Retrieval co-located with the 36th international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval (SIGIR 2013)
Editors
Max L. Wilson, Tony Russell-Rose, Birger Larsen,Preben Hansen, Kristian Norling
Name of conference
EuroHCIR 2013 CEUR Workshop
Publisher
Rheinisch-Westfaelische Technische Hochschule Aachen Lehrstuhl Informatik V