RMIT University
Browse

Life-cycle greenhouse gas emissions of electric and conventional vehicles in Australia

Download (440.15 kB)
conference contribution
posted on 2024-11-23, 06:18 authored by Peter StasinopoulosPeter Stasinopoulos, Nirajan ShiwakotiNirajan Shiwakoti, Sean McDonald
Demand for vehicles with low greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions has led automakers to develop various types of electric vehicles, which have low or no tailpipe emissions. The use of these cars in countries like Australia, where electricity generation is GHG intensive, results in relatively high emissions at power plants. To explore this trade-off, the present study compares the life-cycle GHG emissions of two functionally-similar cars, an electric vehicle (EV) and a conventional vehicle (CV), that are produced in Japan and used in Australia. The study methods are based on the life cycle assessment (LCA) technique, which estimates the environmental impact of a product-system throughout the life cycle. The results suggest that EVs and CVs have similar life-cycle GHG emissions. Compared with CVs, EVs generate more emissions during production, mainly due to the battery, and slightly fewer emissions during use. The life-cycle emissions of both vehicles are dominated by the use stage, suggesting that future work could focus on exploring the expected variation in the relevant parameters. Use-stage emissions depend mostly on uncertain parameters that are influenced by new automotive and energy technology, and on driving intensities and useful lives.

History

Start page

1

End page

10

Total pages

10

Outlet

Proceedings of the 23rd World Congress on Intelligent Transport Systems 2016

Name of conference

ITS - Enhancing Liveable Cities and Communities

Publisher

Intelligent Transport Systems Australia (ITS Australia)

Place published

Port Melbourne, Australia

Start date

2016-10-10

End date

2016-10-14

Language

English

Former Identifier

2006067539

Esploro creation date

2020-06-22

Fedora creation date

2016-10-25

Open access

  • Yes

Usage metrics

    Scholarly Works

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC