RMIT University
Browse

Revising conflicting intention sets in BDI agents

Download (694.09 kB)
conference contribution
posted on 2024-11-23, 05:46 authored by Steven Shapiro, Sebastian SardinaSebastian Sardina, John ThangarajahJohn Thangarajah, Lawrence CavedonLawrence Cavedon, Lin PadghamLin Padgham
Autonomous agents typically have several goals they are pursuing simultaneously. Even if the goals themselves are not necessarily inconsistent, choices made about how to pursue each of these goals may well result in a set of intentions which are conflicting. A rational autonomous agent should be able to reason about and modify its set of intentions to take account of such issues. This paper presents the semantics of some preferences regarding modified sets of intentions. We look at the possibility of simply deleting some intention(s) but more importantly we also look at the possibility of modifying intentions, such that the goals will still be achieved but in a different way.

History

Related Materials

Start page

1

End page

8

Total pages

8

Outlet

Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems 2012

Editors

Wiebe van der Hoek , Lin Padgham, Vincent Conitzer, Michael Winikoff

Name of conference

International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems - IFAAMAS

Publisher

International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems - IFAAMAS

Place published

United States

Start date

2012-06-04

End date

2012-06-08

Language

English

Copyright

© 2012 International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems - IFAAMAS

Former Identifier

2006034548

Esploro creation date

2020-06-22

Fedora creation date

2012-08-30

Open access

  • Yes

Usage metrics

    Scholarly Works

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC