RMIT University
Browse

Benchmarking higher education programs through alignment analysis based on the revised Bloom's taxonomy

journal contribution
posted on 2024-11-02, 09:54 authored by Tri Khai Lam, Kwok Hung LauKwok Hung Lau, Booi KamBooi Kam, Mathews NkhomaMathews Nkhoma, Joan Richardson
Purpose This study proposes a scalable quantitative approach to evaluate alignment within and between courses and programs in higher education for benchmarking purpose. Design/methodology/approach The revised Bloom's taxonomy (RBT), which combines a cognitive process dimension and a knowledge dimension, is used as a basis for categorizing national standards, program and course learning outcomes, and assessment methods. Alignments between programs and national standards, programs and courses, and assessment tasks and courses are then measured using a series of Cohen's kappa statistics. Two undergraduate business programs offered at an Australian university were used as examples to demonstrate the proposed method as an alignment evaluation tool. Findings The findings reveal that the two sample programs are better aligned with national standards than with their respective constituent courses. Degree of alignment between course learning outcomes and assessment methods varies from course to course within the programs. This might be related to the lack of clarity of some learning outcome statements and the complexity of certain assessment methods. Research limitations/implications This study lends insight into the use of an alignment mapping for benchmarking academic programs in higher education. To serve mainly as an illustration of the proposed approach, the case study is limited to two undergraduate business programs offered at the same university. Practical implications Universities can use the proposed approach to benchmark their academic programs against the national standards and similar programs offered by other competing educational institutions. The alignment indices can also serve as yardsticks to continuously improve the consistencies within and among academic programs to ensure quality. Originality/value The proposed method offers a consistent basis to compare the degrees of alignment of different higher education programs with national standards and their re

History

Journal

Benchmarking

Volume

25

Issue

8

Start page

2828

End page

2849

Total pages

22

Publisher

Emerald Publishing

Place published

United Kingdom

Language

English

Copyright

© Emerald Publishing Ltd

Former Identifier

2006088283

Esploro creation date

2020-06-22

Fedora creation date

2019-02-21

Usage metrics

    Scholarly Works

    Keywords

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC