RMIT University
Browse

Benevolent paternalism or a clash of values: Motherhood and refusal of medical treatment in Ireland

journal contribution
posted on 2024-11-01, 11:51 authored by K Wilson, Penelope June WellerPenelope June Weller
While a patient's right to refuse medical treatment is well established in England and Ireland as a legal principle, Fitzpatrick provides an example of how "brittle" this right can be in practice, especially where a patient makes what seems like a morally repugnant decision to people who do not share the patient's religious beliefs. The incapacity finding in Fitzpatrick helped to avoid: (i) the embarrassment (and liability to the hospital) of setting aside an ex parte order of the court to transfuse the patient without her consent; and (ii) creating a precedent on whether the baby's rights to the care of his mother outweighed her rights to autonomy, bodily integrity and religious freedom. In doing so, the Court did not consider the broader social context or the possibility of injustice to the patient. While it could be argued that Fitzpatrick is an extreme case, the boundaries of the law are set by extreme cases. Time will tell whether Fitzpatrick is confined to its extraordinary facts and the extent to which it will shape law reform in Ireland and elsewhere in striking a balance between benevolent paternalism, clashing values and maternal autonomy.

History

Journal

Journal of Mental Health Law

Start page

108

End page

119

Total pages

12

Publisher

Northumbria Law Press

Place published

United Kingdom

Language

English

Copyright

© 2011 Northumbria Law Press

Former Identifier

2006039783

Esploro creation date

2020-06-22

Fedora creation date

2013-07-17

Usage metrics

    Scholarly Works

    Categories

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC