Can biological toxicity drive the contrasting behavior of platinum and gold in surface environments?

In spite of the similar chemical properties of gold (Au) and platinum (Pt), Au is highly mobile in surface environments, whereas Pt appears to be far less so. In this study we assess if geomicrobial processes are likely to cause these differences, as the mobility of Pt and Au should differ little based on thermodynamic solubility alone. To achieve an accurate comparison it is important that both metals occur in the same environment. Mineral- and groundwater samples were obtained from the Fifield Pt Au field in New South Wales, Australia, where Pt and Au nuggets occur in a series of Tertiary eluvial and alluvial paleo-placers. In particular, we studied the pm-scale dispersion of Au and Pt within an extraordinary 10 mm-sized fragment of ferruginous paleochannel material, which contained abundant native Au- and isoferroplatinum grains. Gold grains displayed complex secondary morphologies indicative of biogeochemical transformations, whereas isoferroplatinum grains appeared smooth and well-rounded and showed no signs of supergene transformation. Gold grains were surrounded by a dusting of highly pure metallic Au particles (<10 nm to >10 mu m in diameter), whereas no metallic Pt particles were detected. A search for ionic Pt was also unsuccessful. A series of biotic and abiotic incubation experiments was conducted to investigate the hypothesis that these differences in mobility are driven by interactions with microbiota. Biofilms consisting of metallophilic bacteria formed on ultraflat Au surfaces and caused significant surface transformations. In contrast, only subtle changes were observed on Pt surfaces incubated under similar conditions. Minimal inhibitory concentrations for Au complexes are more than an order of magnitude lower than those measured for Pt complexes in Cupriavidus metallidurans cells.