RMIT University
Browse

Clinton, Bush and Obama: Transitional options?

journal contribution
posted on 2024-11-01, 10:57 authored by Aiden WarrenAiden Warren
This article will outline and evaluate the nuclear policy transition between the Clinton, Bush and Obama administrations. It will argue that while the Clinton administration ignored its historic opportunity to reverse decades of dangerous and provocative nuclear weapons planning, the Bush administration asserted a weapon rationale in which the focus was never on disarmament but rather on extending the life of the remaining stock of nuclear weaponry. The article will then evaluate the extent to which Obama has attempted to 'adjust' the nuclear option with the release of the Congressionally mandated Nuclear Posture Review (NPR). Indeed, while he has struck bold rhetorical notes and promises in relation to limiting the role of nuclear weapons, he has stopped short of changing the status quo. In essence, the Obama administration has pursued a policy of nuclear balance with steps towards disarmament, accompanied by measures to retain America's nuclear primacy.

History

Related Materials

  1. 1.
    ISSN - Is published in 00853224
  2. 2.

Journal

Melbourne Journal of Politics

Volume

35

Start page

61

End page

77

Total pages

17

Publisher

University of Melbourne, School of Social and Political Sciences

Place published

Melbourne, Australia

Language

English

Copyright

© 2012 University of Melbourne

Former Identifier

2006034581

Esploro creation date

2020-06-22

Fedora creation date

2013-01-14

Usage metrics

    Scholarly Works

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC