RMIT University
Browse

Could Canadian-style interest arbitration work in Australia?

journal contribution
posted on 2024-11-01, 22:40 authored by Anthony ForsythAnthony Forsyth
The collective bargaining framework in Australia's Fair Work Act 2009 provides only limited options for mandatory arbitration of collective bargaining disputes (also known as interest disputes). Experience in the first six years of the legislation's operation shows that these avenues for arbitration are rarely utilised, because the statutory tests to activate them are so difficult to meet. Eight federal and provincial Canadian labour law statutes contain provisions for first contract arbitration (FCA), enabling the relevant labour relations board to determine a first collective agreement. This article concludes that FCA in Canada works as a vehicle to promote collective bargaining; and therefore has considerable potential to address the failure of the Fair Work Act effectively to address employer "surface bargaining" tactics and long-running agreement disputes. A variation of British Columbia's extended mediation model of FCA is recommended as the most suitable for adaptation, with Australia's Fair Work Commission given discretion to assess whether bargaining disputes should move from conciliation to interest arbitration. This reform would assist in the attainment of the FW Act's stated objective to encourage collective bargaining, and give more workers access to above-award wages and employment conditions through collective agreements.

History

Journal

Australian Business Law Review

Volume

43

Issue

2

Start page

121

End page

137

Total pages

17

Publisher

Lawbook Co.

Place published

Australia

Language

English

Copyright

© 2015 Thomson Reuters (Professional) Australia Limited

Former Identifier

2006054745

Esploro creation date

2020-06-22

Fedora creation date

2015-08-19

Usage metrics

    Scholarly Works

    Categories

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC