RMIT University
Browse

Depression: The ambivalence of diagnosis

journal contribution
posted on 2024-11-02, 02:52 authored by Renata Kokanovic, Gillian Bendelow, Brigid Philip
The diagnosis of depression in the clinical context is extremely controversial and is subject to criticism of over-medicalisation and pharmaceuticalisation. Depression can be conceptualised across the entire spectrum of lay and medical belief, from the normal' highs and lows of the human condition to its inclusion in the dominant Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders classificatory system, as a form of serious mental illness. In this context, a better understanding of how people describe, experience, negotiate and participate in the process of diagnosis is needed. This article draws on qualitative interviews to explore lay accounts of being diagnosed with depression. The findings reveal that lay accounts of depression vacillate in and out of the medicalised discourse of depression, highlighting the limitations of the biomedical approach to diagnosis and treatment.

History

Related Materials

  1. 1.
    DOI - Is published in 10.1111/j.1467-9566.2012.01486.x
  2. 2.
    ISSN - Is published in 01419889

Journal

Sociology of Health and Illness: a journal of medical sociology

Volume

35

Issue

3

Start page

377

End page

390

Total pages

14

Publisher

Wiley-Blackwell Publishing

Place published

United Kingdom

Language

English

Copyright

© 2012 The Authors. Sociology of Health & Illness © 2012 Foundation for the Sociology of Health & Illness/Blackwell Publishing Ltd

Former Identifier

2006073247

Esploro creation date

2020-06-22

Fedora creation date

2017-06-01

Usage metrics

    Scholarly Works

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC