Ethical preferences for influencing superiors: A 41-society study
journal contribution
posted on 2024-11-01, 07:42 authored by DAVID RALSTON, CAROLYN EGRI, MARIA DE LA GARZA CARRANZA, PREM RAMBURUTH, Jane Terpstra-Tong, Andre Pekerti, ILYA GIRSON, Harald Herrig, MARINA DABIC, Paulina Wan, Moureen Tang, PHILIP HALLINGER, Ian PalmerIan Palmer, DETELIN ELENKOV, OLIVIER FURRER, VOJKO POTOCAN, FLORIAN WANGENHEIM, Isabelle Maignan, Pamela Perrewe, ANA ROSSI, Tomasz Lenartowicz, Donna Ledgerwood, Ruth May, Mark Weber, Jorge Jesuino, Ping Fu, IRINA NAOUMOVA, Tania Casado, LIESL RIDDLE, Malika Richards, ARIF BUTT, Wade Danis, Francisco Castro, Jaime Ruiz-Gutierrez, LAURIE MILTON, MAHFOOZ ANSARI, David Brock, Narasimhan Srinivasan, Arunas Starkus, TEVFIK DALGIC, Fidel Leon-Darder, HUNG THANH, Yong-lin Moon, Ho Beng Chia, MIN KUO, Mario Molteni, Maria Kangasniemi, Kamel Mellahi, Alan WallaceWith a 41-society sample of 9990 managers and professionals, we used hierarchical linear modeling to investigate the impact of both macro-level and micro-level predictors on subordinate influence ethics. While we found that both macro-level and micro-level predictors contributed to the model definition, we also found global agreement for a subordinate influence ethics hierarchy. Thus our findings provide evidence that developing a global model of subordinate ethics is possible, and should be based upon multiple criteria and multilevel variables.
History
Related Materials
- 1.
- 2.
