RMIT University
Browse

Fallow priority areas for spatial trade-offs between cost and efficiency in China

journal contribution
posted on 2024-11-03, 10:24 authored by Siyan Zeng, Fu Chen, Gang-Jun LiuGang-Jun Liu, Estelle Raveloaritiana, Thomas Wanger
Fallow pilot policies exist in China but fallow priority areas have yet to be identified based on eco-environmental stressors and spatial cost-benefit analyses. Here we use a multi-criteria optimization algorithm to determine fallow priority areas based on soil pollution, groundwater overexploitation, land quality, and ecological protection redlines delineation data and with high-cost effectiveness. By considering five spatial scenarios on three objective functions, we find most notably that fallowing the top 20% of priority areas, the benefit of pollution control and environmental protection can be achieved by up to 98.7% and 64.7%, respectively. Our results show that effective fallow prioritization on cultivated land may reduce implementation costs by up to 509.3 billion USD, corresponding to 13.6% of China’s budget in 2021. Thus, effective fallow prioritization will promote sustainable land use by pursuing goals between benefits and cost synergistically and allow budget allocation to other sustainable agricultural targets based on agricultural diversification.

History

Related Materials

  1. 1.
    DOI - Is published in 10.1038/s43247-023-00850-1
  2. 2.
    ISSN - Is published in 26624435

Journal

Communications Earth and Environment

Volume

4

Number

183

Issue

1

Start page

1

End page

10

Total pages

10

Publisher

Nature Publishing Group

Place published

United Kingdom

Language

English

Copyright

© The Author(s) 2023. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

Former Identifier

2006124563

Esploro creation date

2023-08-23

Usage metrics

    Scholarly Works

    Keywords

    Licence

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC