RMIT University
Browse

Fieldwork supervision: supporting ethical reflexivity to enhance research analysis

journal contribution
posted on 2024-11-03, 09:13 authored by Jean HopmanJean Hopman
This is an inquiry into my experience as a doctoral researcher undertaking an action research/narrative inquiry project investigating the emotion experienced in teacher practice. From the outset, I recognized my position as an active participant of the research–a protagonist, a story-teller, a listener, a re-teller–and facilitator. This recognition prompted me to innovatively employ fieldwork supervision (FWS), in addition to my research supervision, to support a process of ethical reflexivity. Such reflexivity refers to an interrogation into personhood by making conscious cognitive and emotional aspects of oneself that compel feeling and action to influence future action. Data from my reflexive journal, interview transcripts and supervision meeting minutes detail a gendered dilemma, which demonstrates how layers of experience, and associated emotion, weave together and that understanding their connection can add depth to research analysis. I argue that the FWS relationship allowed the research to unfold in ways that it might not have otherwise by helping me to understand the power dynamics of the research relationships. In essence, the FWS relationship deepened the rigour and ethicality of this qualitative study by strengthening researcher reflexivity.

History

Journal

International Journal of Research and Method in Education

Volume

44

Issue

1

Start page

41

End page

52

Total pages

12

Publisher

Routledge

Place published

United Kingdom

Language

English

Copyright

© 2019 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group

Former Identifier

2006122912

Esploro creation date

2023-06-21

Usage metrics

    Scholarly Works

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC