posted on 2024-11-23, 07:51authored byLyndell Bruce, Damian Farrow, Annette Raynor
Objectives: The current study sought to examine the scope of domain specificity within a sport expertise context through the examination of positional specificity effects in the sport of netball. Design: Skilled goalers, centre court and defenders along with less skilled (novice) participants were tested on a video-based decision making task. Methods: Skilled and less skilled netballers completed a video-based decision making task, comprising scenarios from the three different
positional areas in netball (goalers, centre court and defence). Participants completed the scenarios from the playing position they were most familiar with, followed by the remaining two positions in a counterbalanced order.
Results: Analysis of the goaler and defence scenarios revealed that the skilled goalers and centre court players were significantly more accurate than the novice players, whilst the skilled defenders did not differ to the other three groups (skilled goalers, skilled centre court and novice). For the centre court scenarios the skilled centre court players and defenders were significantly more accurate than the novice players, whilst the skilled goalers did not differ to any of the groups. Conclusions: Limited evidence was shown to support the theory that decision making is specific to the position being played with the goalers and the centre court players most accurate on the attack and centre court scenarios respectively.
NOTICE: this is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport. Volume 15, Issue 4, July 2012, Pages 361–367 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jsams.2011.11.255