RMIT University
Browse

More on the Liang Bua finds and modern human cretins

journal contribution
posted on 2024-11-01, 12:19 authored by Charles Oxnard, Peter Obendorf, Ben Kefford, John Dennison
Brown (2012: LB1 and LB6 Homo floresiensis are not modern human (Homo sapiens) cretins, Journal of Human Evolution) makes errors of fact, omission and interpretation. Brown's comments refer, among others, to (1) delayed growth and development indicated by unfused epiphyses, (2) postcranial limb proportions: limbs to trunk, between limbs, and within limbs, (3) postcranial bone torsions and angles, (4) postcranial robusticity, real and apparent, (5) skull features, and (6) cretinism on Flores. In each of these areas, much information about cretins is incorrect and much information (Oxnard et al., 2010) comparing the Liang Bua remains with cretins is ignored.

History

Journal

HOMO- Journal of Comparative Human Biology

Volume

63

Issue

6

Start page

407

End page

412

Total pages

6

Publisher

Urban und Fischer Verlag

Place published

Jena, Germany

Language

English

Copyright

© 2012 Elsevier

Former Identifier

2006038327

Esploro creation date

2020-06-22

Fedora creation date

2013-01-21

Usage metrics

    Scholarly Works

    Keywords

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC