On ‘Travelling Traditions’: Emplaced Security in Liberia and Vanuatu

Important sources of everyday security - variously labelled as customary, informal, traditional or autochthonous - are commonly associated with ruralspacesand attributed to the lack of presence or traction of state institutions. However, these practices are not limited to peripheries; they can travel. Their structures, authority and legitimacy can be re-produced in new settings, often in response to the perturbations caused by conflict, while also changing in the course of travel. Consequently, in urban spaces - the supposed 'centre' of the modern state - people's sense of security can be profoundly influenced and shaped by the ordering logics of such 'travelling traditions'. This has ramifications for 'emplaced security' - both short-term responses to acute vulnerability of displaced communities and emergent longer-term forms of order. This article explores the utility of the 'spatial turn' in peacebuilding theory for better understanding this phenomenon. It uses the cases of Vanuatu and Liberia to demonstrate how more nuanced understandings of the (re)construction of authority between and across places and scales may help comprehend how people generate everyday emplaced security. A spatial approach provides analytical leverage that can help to highlight how a phenomenon such as travelling traditions contributes to the formation and substance of emplaced security.