RMIT University
Browse

On the use of AAA and AcurosXB algorithms for three different stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SABR) techniques: Volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT), intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and 3D conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT)

journal contribution
posted on 2024-11-02, 10:41 authored by Abdulrahman Tajaldeen, Prabhakar Ramachandran, Salem Alghamdi, Moshi GesoMoshi Geso
Aim: The purpose of this study was to investigate the dosimetric characteristics of three stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SABR) techniques using the anisotropic analytical algorithm (AAA) and Acuros XB algorithm. The SABR techniques include coplanar volumetric modulated arc therapy (C-VMAT), non-coplanar intensity modulated radiation therapy (NC-IMRT) and non-coplanar three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (NC-3D CRT). Background: SABR is a special type of radiotherapy where a high dose of radiation is delivered over a short time. The treatment outcome and accuracy of the dose delivered to cancer patients highly depend on the dose calculation algorithm and treatment technique. Materials and methods: Twelve lung cancer patients underwent 4D CT scanning, and three different treatment plans were generated: C-VMAT, NC-IMRT, NC-3D CRT. Dose calculation was performed using the AAA and Acuros XB algorithm. The dosimetric indices, such as conformity index (CI), homogeneity index, dose fall-off index, doses received by organs at risk and planning target volume, were used to compare the plans. The accuracy of AAA and Acuros XB (AXB) algorithms for the lung was validated against measured dose on a CIRS thorax phantom. Results: The CIs for C-VMAT, NC-IMRT and NC-3D CRT were 1.21, 1.28 and 1.38 for the AAA, respectively, and 1.17, 1.26 and 1.36 for the Acuros XB algorithm, respectively. The overall dose computed by AcurosXB algorithm was close to the measured dose when compared to the AAA algorithm. The overall dose computed by the AcurosXB algorithm was close to the measured dose when compared to the AAA algorithm. Conclusion: This study showed that the treatment planning results obtained using the Acuros XB algorithm was better than those using the AAA algorithm in SABR lung radiotherapy.

History

Related Materials

  1. 1.
    DOI - Is published in 10.1016/j.rpor.2019.02.008
  2. 2.
    ISSN - Is published in 15071367

Journal

Reports of Practical Oncology and Radiotherapy

Volume

24

Start page

299

End page

408

Total pages

110

Publisher

Elsevier Urban & Partner Sp. z o.o.

Place published

Poland

Language

English

Copyright

© 2019 Greater Poland Cancer Centre. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Former Identifier

2006092137

Esploro creation date

2020-06-22

Fedora creation date

2019-09-23

Usage metrics

    Scholarly Works

    Categories

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC