RMIT University
Browse

Organizing innovation projects under technological turbulence

journal contribution
posted on 2024-11-01, 14:01 authored by M Candi, Jan van den Ende, Gerda Gemser
Research on the organization of innovation projects suggests that increased project flexibility is a common reaction to high levels of technological turbulence. However, existing definitions of project flexibility are inconsistent and sometimes unclear, and empirical evidence is limited. This article makes an important distinction between flexible project planning and flexible project specifications. A negative relationship is found between flexible project planning and innovation project performance, whereas flexible product specifications are found to contribute positively. This article also examines how technological turbulence contributes to the choice of flexible or inflexible strategies. Technological turbulence can be present in the external environment or can be internal to the firm, when radically new products are developed. The findings suggest that when businesses perceive technological turbulence in the environment they are more likely to adopt flexible approaches to innovation in an attempt to adapt to external pressures. In technologically innovative projects, product specifications are likely to remain fixed while project organization is likely to be adapted to the needs of the project. Taken together, the findings suggest that innovation projects should maintain stable organization, schedules and budgets, but stay flexible about product specifications. Vigilance with regards to external and internal conditions of technological turbulence, which may lead organizations to be more flexible in terms of project planning, is needed.

History

Journal

Technovation

Volume

33

Issue

4-5

Start page

133

End page

141

Total pages

9

Publisher

Pergamon

Place published

United Kingdom

Language

English

Copyright

© 2013 Elsevier Ltd.

Former Identifier

2006040928

Esploro creation date

2020-06-22

Fedora creation date

2013-05-13

Usage metrics

    Scholarly Works

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC