RMIT University
Browse

Potential effectiveness of Chinese herbal medicine Yu ping feng san for adult allergic rhinitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Download (2.31 MB)
journal contribution
posted on 2024-11-23, 10:43 authored by Qiulan Luo, Shui Qing ZhangShui Qing Zhang, Lihong Yang, Tony ZhangTony Zhang, Xinfeng Guo, Charlie XueCharlie Xue, Chuanjian Lu
Background: Chinese herbal medicine formula Yu ping feng san (YPFS) is commonly used for allergic rhinitis (AR). Previous review had summarized the effectiveness and safety of YPFS, however without any subgroup analysis performed to provide detailed evidence for guiding clinical practice. YPFS was recommended for the management of AR by Chinese medicine clinical practice guideline, but the treatment duration of YPFS was also not specified. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of YPFS in treating adult AR with the most recent evidence, and attempt to specify the duration of utilisation through subgroup meta-analyses. Methods: Seven databases were searched from their inceptions to September 2017. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating YPFS for adult AR were included. Methodological quality of studies was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool. Meta-analysis and subgroup meta-analyses were conducted for evaluating the effectiveness of YPFS. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach was used for rating the quality of evidence. Results: Twenty-two RCTs involving 23 comparisons were included in this review. YPFS was compared to placebo, pharmacotherapy, and used as an add-on treatment compared to pharmacotherapy. Meta-analyses were feasible for the outcomes of four individual nasal symptom scores and "effective rate". Four individual nasal symptom scores decreased after YPFS' combination treatment: itchy nose (MD-0.46, 95% CI[-0.50, -0.42]), sneezing (MD-0.41, 95% CI[-0.47, -0.35] ), blocked nose (MD-0.46, 95% CI[-0.54, -0.39]) and runny nose (MD-0.42, 95% CI[-0.58, -0.26] ). Based on "effective rate", meta-analysis showed that YPFS did not achieve better effect than pharmacotherapy (RR1.07, 95%CI [0.94, 1.22), but its combination with pharmacotherapy seemed more effective than pharmacotherapy alone (RR1.27, 95%CI [1.19, 1.34]) (low quality).

History

Related Materials

  1. 1.
    DOI - Is published in 10.1186/s12906-017-1988-5
  2. 2.
    ISSN - Is published in 14726882

Journal

BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine

Volume

17

Number

485

Issue

1

Start page

1

End page

20

Total pages

20

Publisher

BioMed Central

Place published

United Kingdom

Language

English

Copyright

© 2017 The Author(s). Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0

Former Identifier

2006081796

Esploro creation date

2020-06-22

Fedora creation date

2018-09-20

Open access

  • Yes

Usage metrics

    Scholarly Works

    Licence

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC