RMIT University
Browse

Quantification of differences in the effective atomic numbers of healthy and cancerous tissues: A discussion in the context of diagnostics and dosimetry

journal contribution
posted on 2024-11-01, 04:31 authored by Michael Taylor
Purpose: There are a range of genetic and nongenetic factors influencing the elemental composition of different human tissues. The elemental composition of cancerous tissues frequently differs from healthy tissue of the same organ, particularly in high-Z trace element concentrations. For this reason, one could suggest that this may be exploited in diagnostics and perhaps even influence dosimetry. Methods: In this work, for the first time, effective atomic numbers are computed for common cancerous and healthy tissues using a robust, energy-dependent approach between 10 keV and 100 MeV. These are then quantitatively compared within the context of diagnostics and dosimetry. Results: Differences between effective atomic numbers of healthy and diseased tissues are found to be typically less than 10. Fibrotic tissues and calcifications of the breast exhibit substantial (tens to hundreds of percent) differences to healthy tissue. Expectedly, differences are most pronounced in the photoelectric regime and consequently most relevant for kV imagingtherapy and radionuclides with prominent low-energy peaks. Cancerous tissue of the testes and stomach have lower effective atomic numbers than corresponding healthy tissues, while diseased tissues of the other organ sites typically have higher values.

History

Related Materials

  1. 1.
    DOI - Is published in 10.1118/1.4742849
  2. 2.
    ISSN - Is published in 00942405

Journal

Medical Physics

Volume

39

Issue

9

Start page

5437

End page

5445

Total pages

9

Publisher

American Association of Physicists in Medicine

Place published

Melville, NY, USA

Language

English

Copyright

© 2012 American Association of Physicists in Medicine

Former Identifier

2006038242

Esploro creation date

2020-06-22

Fedora creation date

2013-04-29

Usage metrics

    Scholarly Works

    Categories

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC