RMIT University
Browse

Quantitative evaluation of the adhesion of metallic coatings using cylindrical substrate

Download (1.64 MB)
journal contribution
posted on 2024-11-23, 07:55 authored by Joe ElambasserilJoe Elambasseril, Raafat Ibrahim
This paper introduces an effective interfacial fracture toughness test based on interface fracture mechanics theory. This testing method uses a circumferentially notched tensile (CNT) specimen, which is ideally suited for determining the interfacial fracture resistance of coatings. Unlike other interfacial fracture tests, this test is simple to prepare, requires minimum test setup and is easy to model. An interfacial pre-crack was generated between a nickel coating and mild steel cylindrical substrate to evaluate adhesion strength. In situ acoustic and SEM analyses were used to determine the crack initiation or the critical load of failure. The critical energy release rate, critical stress intensity factors and phase angle were determined using the J integral which was determined by applying the critical load to the finite element model. A detailed finite element analysis was carried out to study the effect of different interface pre-crack positions and mode mixity on energy release rate for different notch angles and elastic modulus ratios. The cracking resistance of the interface was characterised by the notch angle of CNT specimens. The analysis showed an increase in interfacial fracture toughness as phase angle increases and was significant when the phase angle was large. The combined results of computational and experimental analysis showed that any defect or stress concentration at the interface could significantly weaken the adhesion of coating.

History

Journal

Materials and Design

Volume

33

Issue

1

Start page

641

End page

651

Total pages

11

Publisher

Elsevier

Place published

Oxford, United Kingdom

Language

English

Copyright

© 2011 Elsevier Ltd.

Former Identifier

2006035979

Esploro creation date

2020-06-22

Fedora creation date

2013-04-29

Open access

  • Yes

Usage metrics

    Scholarly Works

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC