RMIT University
Browse

ROC Analyses of Relevant Conners 3–Short Forms, CBCL, and TRF Scales for Screening ADHD and ODD

journal contribution
posted on 2024-11-03, 09:49 authored by Rapson GomezRapson Gomez, Alasdair Vance, Shaun Watson, Vasileios StavropoulosVasileios Stavropoulos
Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was used to examine and compare the diagnostic accuracy of the Conners 3–Parent Short Form (C 3-P(S)), and the Conners 3–Teacher Short Form (C 3-T(S)) inattention and hyperactivity/impulsivity scales, and the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) and Teacher’s Report Form (TRF) attention problems scales, to distinguish those with and without attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). It also examined and compared the diagnostic accuracy of the C 3-P(S) and C 3-T(S) Aggression (AG) scales, and the CBCL and TRF Aggressive Behavior (AB) scales, to distinguish those with and without oppositional defiant disorder (ODD). The study used archival data (N = 150-261) involving a large group of clinic-referred children aged between 6 and 11 years who had been interviewed for clinical diagnosis of ADHD and ODD using the Anxiety Disorders Interview Schedule for Children (ADISC-IV) as the reference standard, and then administered one or more of the screening measures. The findings provided empirical support for the use of the C 3-P(S) and CBCL for identifying ADHD and ODD, with the CBCL aggressive behavior scale having better ability to detect ODD. The implications of the findings for using the screening scales for diagnoses of ADHD and ODD are discussed.

History

Related Materials

  1. 1.
    DOI - Is published in 10.1177/1073191119876023
  2. 2.
    ISSN - Is published in 10731911

Journal

Assessment

Volume

28

Issue

1

Start page

73

End page

85

Total pages

13

Publisher

SAGE Publications Inc.

Place published

Thousand Oaks, USA

Language

English

Copyright

© Gomez et al. 2019

Former Identifier

2006123681

Esploro creation date

2023-07-21