RMIT University
Browse

Recommendations to reduce inequalities for LGBT people facing advanced illness: ACCESSCare national qualitative interview study

journal contribution
posted on 2024-11-02, 09:14 authored by Katherine Bristowe, Matthew Hodson, Bee Wee, Kathryn Almack, Katherine JohnsonKatherine Johnson, Barbara Daveson, Jonathan Koffman, Linda McEnhill, Richard Harding
Background: Lesbian, gay, bisexual and/or trans (LGBT) people have higher risk of certain life-limiting illnesses and unmet needs in advanced illness and bereavement. ACCESSCare is the first national study to examine in depth the experiences of LGBT people facing advanced illness. Aim: To explore health-care experiences of LGBT people facing advanced illness to elicit views regarding sharing identity (sexual orientation/gender history), accessing services, discrimination/exclusion and best-practice examples. Design: Semi-structured in-depth qualitative interviews analysed using thematic analysis. Setting/participants: In total, 40 LGBT people from across the United Kingdom facing advanced illness: cancer (n=21), non-cancer (n=16) and both a cancer and a non-cancer conditions (n=3). Results: In total, five main themes emerged: (1) person-centred care needs that may require additional/different consideration for LGBT people (including different social support structures and additional legal concerns), (2) service level or interactional (created in the consultation) barriers/stressors (including heteronormative assumptions and homophobic/transphobic behaviours), (3) invisible barriers/stressors (including the historical context of pathology/criminalisation, fears and experiences of discrimination) and (4) service level or interactional facilitators (including acknowledging and including partners in critical discussions). These all shape (5) individuals' preferences for disclosing identity. Prior experiences of discrimination or violence, in response to disclosure, were carried into future care interactions and heightened with the frailty of advanced illness. Conclusion: Despite recent legislative change, experiences of discrimination and exclusion in health care persist for LGBT people. Ten recommendations, for health-care professionals and services/institutions, are made from the data. These are simple, low cost and offer potential gains in access to, and outcomes of, care for LGBT people.

History

Related Materials

  1. 1.
    DOI - Is published in 10.1177/0269216317705102
  2. 2.
    ISSN - Is published in 02692163

Journal

Palliative Medicine

Volume

32

Issue

1

Start page

23

End page

35

Total pages

13

Publisher

Sage Publications Ltd.

Place published

United Kingdom

Language

English

Copyright

© The Author(s) 2017

Former Identifier

2006089000

Esploro creation date

2020-06-22

Fedora creation date

2019-02-21

Usage metrics

    Scholarly Works

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC