Remuneration Committees and Attribution Disclosures on Remuneration Decisions: Australian Evidence
journal contribution
posted on 2024-11-02, 12:02 authored by Sutharson Kanapathippillai, Dessalegn MihretDessalegn Mihret, Shireenjit Johl© 2017, Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature. The use of remuneration committees (RCs) to foster corporate accountability concerning executive remuneration decisions has attracted increasing public attention following various corporate scandals and the recent global financial crisis (GFC). This study empirically examines the link between RCs and attributions disclosures, i.e. explanation of reasons for executive remuneration decisions. Using a sample of 644 firm-year observations drawn from top 200 Australian Securities Exchange (ASX)-listed firms from 2007 to 2011, we find that firms with RCs tend to voluntarily disclose attribution, and the extent of disclosures increases with remuneration committee quality. While existence of attribution disclosures is related to pay-performance sensitivity, the extent of disclosures does not show incremental effect on pay-performance sensitivity. The results also show that the presence and quality of RCs are positively associated with internal attribution disclosures regarding executive remuneration decisions during the GFC, suggesting corporate responsiveness to corporate accountability demands at times of economic crisis.
History
Related Materials
- 1.
- 2.
Journal
Journal of Business EthicsVolume
158Issue
4Start page
1063End page
1082Total pages
20Publisher
SpringerPlace published
NetherlandsLanguage
EnglishCopyright
© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2017Former Identifier
2006097057Esploro creation date
2020-06-22Fedora creation date
2020-04-21Usage metrics
Categories
Keywords
Licence
Exports
RefWorksRefWorks
BibTeXBibTeX
Ref. managerRef. manager
EndnoteEndnote
DataCiteDataCite
NLMNLM
DCDC

