RMIT University
Browse

Science sidelined in approval of Australia’s largest coal mine

journal contribution
posted on 2024-11-02, 13:08 authored by Matthew CurrellMatthew Currell, Dylan Irvine, Adrian Werner, Chris McGrath
State and federal governments in Australia recently approved water management plans for one of the largest coal mines ever proposed. This comes as the role of coal in the world’s future energy mix is being seriously questioned, and global concern over the climate and water implications of further fossil fuel development. Despite repeated advice from multiple independent scientists, governments did not compel the mining company to conduct the investigations required to determine its risks to important nearby groundwater-dependent ecosystems, leaving open the prospect of irreversible ecological and cultural damage. Here we show how scientific advice provided to decision makers was repeatedly ignored or dismissed, while scientists and agencies were subjected to political pressure. We argue that this echoes other examples of scientific evidence being ignored where findings clash with political or economic objectives, and warrants urgent review of decision-making processes for developments with major environmental consequences.

History

Related Materials

  1. 1.
    DOI - Is published in 10.1038/s41893-020-0527-4
  2. 2.
    ISSN - Is published in 23989629

Journal

Nature Sustainability

Volume

3

Issue

8

Start page

644

End page

649

Total pages

6

Publisher

Nature

Place published

United Kingdom

Language

English

Copyright

© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited 2020

Former Identifier

2006099154

Esploro creation date

2021-06-01

Usage metrics

    Scholarly Works

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC