RMIT University
Browse

Silence: Civil right or social privilege? A discourse analytic response to a legal problem

Download (336.48 kB)
journal contribution
posted on 2024-11-23, 07:33 authored by Georgina HeydonGeorgina Heydon
According to an understanding of casual conversation articulated by various theories of discourse analysis including Conversation Analysis (Sacks et al., 1974), pragmatics (Levinson, 1983) and politeness theory (Brown and Levinson, 1987), it is extremely unlikely that silence would ever be regarded as an appropriate response to a question or accusation. Yet, in the specialised institutional setting of a police interview, it is expected by the legislators in many jurisdictions that ordinary people will be able to access this interactional resource unproblematically, and presumably without any assumption of listener prejudice.

History

Related Materials

  1. 1.
    DOI - Is published in 10.1016/j.pragma.2011.01.003
  2. 2.
    ISSN - Is published in 03782166

Journal

Journal of Pragmatics

Volume

43

Issue

9

Start page

2308

End page

2316

Total pages

9

Publisher

Elsevier BV

Place published

Netherlands

Language

English

Copyright

© 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved

Notes

NOTICE: this is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Journal of Pragmatics. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Journal of Pragmatics, vol. 43, no. 9, 2011. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2011.01.003

Former Identifier

2006021486

Esploro creation date

2020-06-22

Fedora creation date

2011-10-14

Open access

  • Yes

Usage metrics

    Scholarly Works

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC