RMIT University
Browse

Taming a wicked problem: Resolving controversies in biodiversity offsetting

journal contribution
posted on 2024-11-02, 00:06 authored by Martine Maron, Christopher Ives, Heini Kujalah, Joseph Bull, Fleur Maseyk, Sarah Bekessy, Ascelin GordonAscelin Gordon, James Watson, Pia Lentini, Philip Gibbons, Hugh Possingham, Richard Hobbs, David Keith, Brendan Wintle, Megan Evans
The rising popularity of biodiversity offsetting as a tool for balancing biodiversity losses from development with equivalent gains elsewhere has sparked debate on many fronts. The fundamental questions are the following: Is offsetting as good, as bad, or at least better than the status quo for biodiversity conservation outcomes, and what do we need to know to decide? We present a concise synthesis of the most contentious issues related to biodiversity offsetting, categorized as ethical, social, technical, or governance challenges. In each case, we discuss avenues for reducing disagreement over these issues and identify those that are likely to remain unresolved. We argue that there are many risks associated with theunscrutinized expansion of offset policy. Nevertheless, governments are increasingly adopting offset policies, so working rapidly to clarify and- where possible-to resolve these issues is essential.

Funding

Evaluating environment policy that has immediate costs but long-term gains

Australian Research Council

Find out more...

History

Related Materials

  1. 1.
    DOI - Is published in 10.1093/biosci/biw038
  2. 2.
    ISSN - Is published in 00063568

Journal

Bioscience

Volume

66

Issue

6

Start page

489

End page

498

Total pages

10

Publisher

Oxford University Press

Place published

United States

Language

English

Copyright

© The Author(s) 2016

Former Identifier

2006060652

Esploro creation date

2020-06-22

Fedora creation date

2016-04-21