RMIT University
Browse

The state of wildfire and bushfire science: Temporal trends, research divisions and knowledge gaps

journal contribution
posted on 2024-11-02, 20:25 authored by Milad Haghani, Erica KuligowskiErica Kuligowski, Abbas Rajabifard, Crystal Kolden
Along with the increase in the frequency of disastrous wildfires and bushfires around the world during the recent decades, scholarly research efforts have also intensified in this domain. This work investigates divisions and trends of the domain of wildfire/bushfire research. Results show that this research domain has been growing exponentially. It is estimated that the field, as of 2021, it has grown to larger than 13,000 research items, with an excess of 1,200 new articles appearing every year. It also exhibits distinct characteristics of a multidisciplinary research domain. Analyses of the underlying studies reveal that the field is made up of five major divisions. These divisions embody research activities around (i) forest ecology and climate, (ii) fire detection and mapping technologies, (iii) community risk mitigation and planning, (iv) soil and water ecology, and (v) atmospheric science. Research into the sub-topics of reciprocal effects between climate change and fire activities, fire risk modelling/mapping (including burned area modelling), wildfire impact on organic matter, biomass burning, and human health impacts currently constitute trending areas of this field. Amongst these, the climate cluster showed an explosion of activities in 2020 while the human health cluster is identified as the most recent emerging topic of this domain. On the other hand, dimensions of wildfire research related to human behaviour—particularly issues of emergency training, risk perception and wildfire hazard education—seem to be notably underdeveloped in this field, making this one of its most apparent knowledge gaps. A scoping review of all reviews and meta-analysis of this field demonstrates that this sub-topic is also virtually non-existent on the research synthesis front. This meta-synthesis further reveals how a western, deductive view excludes socioecological and traditional knowledge of fire.

History

Related Materials

  1. 1.
    DOI - Is published in 10.1016/j.ssci.2022.105797
  2. 2.
    ISSN - Is published in 09257535

Journal

Safety Science

Volume

153

Number

105797

Start page

1

End page

28

Total pages

28

Publisher

Elsevier BV

Place published

Netherlands

Language

English

Copyright

© 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Former Identifier

2006114635

Esploro creation date

2023-03-01

Usage metrics

    Scholarly Works

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC