RMIT University
Browse

Using building simulation to model the drying of flooded building archetypes

Download (1.29 MB)
journal contribution
posted on 2024-11-23, 08:40 authored by Jonathon Taylor, P Biddulph, Michael Davies, Ian Ridley, A Mavrogianni, Eleni Oikonomou, Ka man Lai
With a changing climate, London is expected to experience more frequent periods of intense rainfall and tidal surges, leading to an increase in the risk of flooding. This paper describes the simulation of the drying of flooded building archetypes representative of the London building stock using the EnergyPlus-based hygrothermal tool ‘University College London-Heat and Moisture Transfer (UCL-HAMT)’ in order to determine the relative drying rates of different built forms and envelope designs. Three different internal drying scenarios, representative of conditions where no professional remediation equipment is used, are simulated. A mould model is used to predict the duration of mould growth risk following a flood on the internal surfaces of the different building types. Heating properties while keeping windows open dried dwellings fastest, while purpose built flats and buildings with insulated cavity walls were found to dry slowest.

History

Related Materials

  1. 1.
    DOI - Is published in 10.1080/19401493.2012.703243
  2. 2.
    ISSN - Is published in 19401493

Journal

Journal of Building Performance Simulation

Volume

6

Issue

2

Start page

119

End page

140

Total pages

22

Publisher

Taylor & Francis

Place published

United Kingdom

Language

English

Copyright

© 2013 International Building Performance Simulation Association (IBPSA)

Notes

This is an Author's Original Manuscript of an article whose final and definitive form, the Version of Record, has been published in the Journal of Building Performance Simulation, 2013, copyright Taylor & Francis, available online at: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/19401493.2012.703243.

Former Identifier

2006040538

Esploro creation date

2020-06-22

Fedora creation date

2013-04-15

Open access

  • Yes

Usage metrics

    Scholarly Works

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC