RMIT University
Browse

Values and cognitive mechanisms: Comparing the predictive factors of Australian meat intake

journal contribution
posted on 2024-11-02, 07:35 authored by Eleanor Trethewey, Mervyn JacksonMervyn Jackson
Recent studies have found values for animal-welfare, personal-health and the environment to be the main factors motivating veg*n diets. However, studies are yet to simultaneously compare these values between Australian meat-eaters, vegetarians, and vegans, and therefore, the extent to which they motivate these groups. Further, while cognitive mechanisms (methods of reducing the psychological discomfort of eating meat while holding such values) have been found to facilitate meat intake, these mechanisms are yet to be compared against values in their ability to predict meat consumption. In the current study, meat-eaters reported the lowest concern for animal-welfare, personal-health, and the environment. With the exception of personal-health, vegans reported the greatest concern for these factors. However, cognitive mechanisms predicted meat consumption more strongly than these values. These findings may have implications for reducing meat consumption and improving outcomes for animal-welfare, public health and the environment.

History

Related Materials

  1. 1.
    DOI - Is published in 10.1016/j.appet.2019.104386
  2. 2.
    ISSN - Is published in 01956663

Journal

Appetite

Volume

142

Number

104386

Start page

1

End page

7

Total pages

7

Publisher

Elsevier BV

Place published

Netherlands

Language

English

Copyright

© 2019

Former Identifier

2006094510

Esploro creation date

2020-06-22

Fedora creation date

2019-12-02

Usage metrics

    Scholarly Works

    Keywords

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC